Under Funded Pension VS. Over Funded Welfare

   

Recently, the National Association of State Retirement Administrators recognized New Jersey as having the most underfunded pension system of all 50 states.  They said that the NJ pension fund could be out of money by 2027 http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/03/nj_pension_system_most_underfunded_of_all_50_state.html#incart_river.

This isn't too much of a surprise, since New Jersey skipped pension payments completely from 2001 until 2004, and have generally put in less than the required payments since the mid 1990's. This resulted in billions less being put into the pension accounts, while at the same time, benefits increased.  Keep in mind that during this time, all of the union workers kept making payments without skipping a beat, and were forced to increase their pension payments to keep the pension funded.  In addition to an increase in payments, the retirement age was increased, and the cost of living adjustment was eliminated.  It hasn't worked out so well, and currently the state faces an $83 billion unfunded pension liability.  This is by no fault of the union workers, but the blame lies squarely in the laps of our current Governor and his predecessors.

     Governor Christie has touted the pension reform from day one, even after promising the unions not to touch their pensions.  It has been the mainstay of his soap box, and continues to this day.  It's a shame that the hard working union members, who have made pension payments from day one of their employment, have to be the scapegoats for the failures of the Governor.

     What I find upsetting, is how the Governor has been basically mum about reducing the benefits (handouts) that are given to a slew of residents, both legal and illegal, that have been on the receiving end of our tax dollars.  These are the same tax dollars that the Governor says is lacking to the point of an almost broke TTF (transportation trust fund).  Just as an example, according the a study by the Center of Immigration Studies, in 2009 (based on data collected in 2010), 57 percent of households headed by an immigrant (legal and illegal) with children (under 18) used at least one welfare program.  You saw that correctly.  Fifty-seven percent.  Over half are receiving welfare benefits.  Nationwide, Newark, NJ ranked No. 1 on a list ranking the cities across the country with the highest percentage of households on welfare.  That' right: NUMBER ONE in the country.   Where is the outrage and public condemnation?  (Insert sound of crickets here).  Welcome to the welfare state.

     While there have been some minimal reductions in welfare, the funding doesn't seem to be in the spotlight like it was years ago when "work-fare" instead of "welfare" was a hot topic.  Currently, the attention seems to be aimed directly at those that helped fund the welfare bottomless pits: the taxpayers.  Don't get me wrong; there are very legitimate uses for welfare.  It should be a temporary crutch to get a person or family back on their feet.  One of the problems is that many have come to rely on this crutch as an income with no end.  Fraud is rampant in welfare.  Additionally, what incentive does someone have to work when welfare pays more?

     The Governor is all about "reform", specifically PENSION REFORM.  It's about time that the Governor change directions and take a good hard look at WELFARE REFORM instead.  Welfare is supposed to be temporary, while a pension is for life.  One of the huge differences is the welfare recipients are receiving money put there by others, while the pensioner is receiving money put there by him/her, employer contributions, and the pension fund investments.  The number of people taking some type of welfare or handout from the state vastly outnumbers those receiving pensions.  This may be why the Governor doesn't want to piss of those voters...I mean constituents.

     While there are some attempts to reform welfare into a form of "work-fare", surprisingly enough, the ACLU is objecting to it for a variety of reasons, including calling it a form of discrimination by making someone work for their benefits.   How dare the government make someone work for their benefits! I don't recall the ACLU supporting me in my twenty-five years of working in order to get my benefits (which I paid dearly for).

     According to US Government Spending.com, in 2015 New Jersey will spend $9.7 billion in the pension systems (all of them), while at the same time, spent $9.1 billion in welfare.  Where will this money come from?  The pension money comes from the union members, employer contributions, and investments.  The welfare money comes from taxes.  Your taxes.  My taxes.  Reducing the rampant welfare fraud, and requiring welfare recipients to work for their handouts should be just the start.

     This is where the Governor should be focusing, not on the already beaten down union members who have worked their entire lives and put more money into the system than anyone else.  We've given enough.

     If history is any indication of how he will do as a Presidential candidate, he will embarrass New Jersey.

     Just my opinion.

Note: Ok, so the headline may be a bit deceiving.  Do I honestly think welfare is "over funded"?  No, not really, but I do want it reduced substantially through various means.  Welfare (workfare) has its place, but not to the extent it is being used now for "entitlements" or handouts.

Pension cuts head to court

On June 25th, oral arguments will be heard by Mercer County Superior Court Judge Mary Jacobson for a lawsuit brought by the NJSP union.  Judge Jacobson said she would decide whether Christie's plan violates the 2010 pension law that Governor Christie himself passed.  This will be a major challenge to Governor Christies plan to skip a huge pension payment for both this and next fiscal years.  Governor Christie said he needs to use the money to solve a budget crisis.

The Governor is planning on taking $900 million through an executive order he signed last month, and an additional $1.5 billion for the next financial year (which begins in 3 weeks).  Christie said the state constitution requires a balanced budget every year, and this money is needed to prevent huge cuts to hospitals or schools, or major tax hikes.  However, his failure to make the pension payments violates a law he created during his first term.  It also violates a section of the NJ state constitution that states, in part, "the Legislature shall not pass any bill...impairing the obligations of contracts".

The Governor has stated that failure to make these payments is fiscally irresponsible and taking the pension money was a "regrettable move", but the state can't afford to keep paying public workers the benefits they currently get. Lets not forget that this is the same Governor that just gave many of his own staff raises as high at 23%, while at the same time he requires others to stay under the 2% cap.  How can he call one thing fiscally irresponsible, but give huge raises at the same time? 

New Jerseys Moody's credit rating has been downgraded several times since Christie has been in office.  Fee's in New Jersey have skyrocketed.  The cost to register as a corporation fifteen years ago was $50 per year.  Today it is $500 per year; a 10-fold increase.  Motor vehicle fees have quadrupled in the past fifteen years.  These are not considered "taxes", so there is not much in the way of public outcry.  Is there really a difference between a state fee and a tax?  No.  When there is a shortage of money, you would think the Governor would created a solid tax base from businesses that are seeking to come to New Jersey, but he does the exact opposite.  Since 2010, the state has doled out over 2 billion dollars in incentives to corporations and developers.  Compare that number with the $1.5 billion given out in incentives during the prior 10 years. That money could have been used to our benefit, not to the benefit of corporations and developers.

Never in the history of our state has our leadership been so poor.  Lies, deceptions, double-speak, willfully not following the law, and so on and so on...

Judge Mary Jacobson, please make the right decision, and put our pension fund money where it was meant to be.







.

More bad news for the pension system - and more double speak by our Governor

New Jersey can't seem to keep out of the news lately.  I guess its because we have a Governor that has his sights set on a national stage.  Governor Christie is weeks away from announcing his proposal to overhaul our states pension and retiree health benefits plan.  The rumor mill is swirling that it might be some type of "hybrid" model that would reduce the defined benefit payout, as well as something like a 401k plan.  He keeps saying that the current system can't be sustained.  The reason he believes this is because he allowed towns to skip their required pension matching payments, and he also failed to make the states full pension contribution.  Although three years ago, Governor Christie himself passed a law requiring the pension payment, he decided to ignore it in order to use the money to balance the states budget.  This is just another example of his ability to talk from both sides of his mouth.  He touted this law when it was being proposed in order to (again) gain support of the police and fire unions.  "Hey, look at me, I'm fixing your problem.  I'm your friend".  Once again he lied.  He did not fix the problem.  His own law that he pushed through was ignored. 

New Jersey has already eliminated the "COLA" (Cost of Living Increases); a savings of $74 billion over 30 years according to our Governor.  He also touted another savings of $48 billion by requiring employees to pay more toward their pensions, reducing pensions for those taking early retirement, and raising the retirement age from 62 to 65.  A total savings of $112 Billion!  What's next?  Reducing all officers pay to minimum wage?  Eliminating health benefits entirely?  Health benefits is one main reason many officers joined the ranks of police and fire, or became public school teachers.

Here is a little history lesson for the uninformed. As recently as the 1980's, police officer and firefighters were relatively paid poorly compared to the private industry.  They were considered blue collar and non-professional.  In order to induce people to join the ranks of police and fire with low pay, the carrot that was dangled in front of the was good benefits.  Seemed like a fair trade off at the time.  The "problem" is that over the years, contracts regularly gave pay increases of 3-5% per year, and sometimes more.  Over time, those poor paying jobs became good paying jobs, and eventually they became very good paying jobs.  The benefits were still good, so now you have officers making good money and getting good benefits.  Along with the higher pay and benefits came the increased professionalism.  Being a police officer changed from being a "job" to being a "career".  With professionalism came better educated officers.  No longer were high school diploma's the minimum requirement.  College degrees became the norm; if not for hiring at least for promotions.  College degrees included Masters degrees and even higher over time.  It was not uncommon for a majority of officers on a department to hold college degree of one type or another.  Criminal Justice majors became more common.  Twenty-five years later, the person entering law enforcement in New Jersey was college educated who's goal it was to become a professional police officer.  Good pay and good benefits brought good candidates, who became good police officers.  Now, both the pay and benefits are good.

Unfortunately, the COST of these benefits have skyrocketed.  The insurance companies have substantially increased the cost the governments pay in order to keep the benefits as required by contracts.  Why is the government not targeting the insurance companies and asking why they have tripled the cost for the same benefits?  Good question.  I'd love to know that answer.  I can surmise that one reason is that the insurance lobby is strong.  Very strong.  Much stronger than any police and fire or teachers union in New Jersey.  They are national companies with deep pockets in Washington.  Who is an easier target?   The police, fire and teachers.  Now Governor Christie has made us look like the bad guys.  We are the reason for all this mess. "Look at those greedy public servants" he can say, and the public listens.  Governor Christie isn't stupid.  He's been voted into office twice and knows a thing or two about word play.

Word play.  Governor Christie loves this.  A perfect example was recently brought to light that makes this perfectly clear.   A perfect example of the governors double speak is when he was pushing for a tax cut in 2012.  The Governor said the state could afford the tax cut because of positive economic growth.  Dr. David Rosen, the Chief Budget officer for the States office of legislative service disagreed.  The Governor responded by lambasting Dr. Rosen and calling him "the Dr. Kevorkian of the numbers".  The Governor said the numbers were good enough for a tax cut, and said "Why would anybody with a functioning brain believe this guy?" about Dr. Rosen, who by the way has a reputation for being right more than being wrong.  Later, when questioned by our states terrible financial crisis, Christie blames Dr. Rosen, saying that he "just got it wrong".

Recap: Christie ignores his Chief Budget Officer in 2012, calling him "the Dr. Kevorkian of the numbers" and "why would anybody with a functioning brain believe this guy".  When questioned by a reporter about our states terrible financial crisis, he blames this same person that he ignored two years earlier.

Another example of his word play and talking out of both sides of his mouth.  While facing an unexpected $2.75 billion budget gap over the next 13 months, which Christie is trying to close by delaying payments to the state’s pension fund, many on his staff have received raises of 23%!  Yes, you read that right, twenty-three percent (http://nj1015.com/some-christie-staff-members-get-large-pay-raises/).

According to NorthJersey.com, the raises come as Christie is withholding more than $2.4 billion in payments to the state pension fund because of revenue shortfalls. And Christie has delayed a property-tax relief program that averages about $500 for seniors and some families.  And the raises to the governor’s staff appear to have happened around the same time Christie vetoed the minutes of the commission that oversees the Pinelands after its members voted to increase the budget for its staff by 5 percent. Christie castigated the commissioners and said the decision was a “conscious disregard of the fiscal realities".

I'm sorry, I think I went a bit off topic there, but every time I think about how the Governor screwed the people who protect and educate the public, while being a two-faced politician, I get angrier and angrier.  Bottom line?  As time goes by, the Governor is going to continue to lie and continue to blame the unions for problems created and perpetuated by our elected officials. 

Comments?  Thoughts?  Ideas?